Skip to main content

What is theoretical framework?



Theoretical Framework

Theoretical framework in research provides the foundation for understanding the research problem, guiding data collection and analysis, and interpreting the study's findings. It is essentially a set of interrelated theories, models, and concepts that outline key ideas relevant to the research topic, offering insights into how the topic functions or is likely to function. Here’s a detailed look at theoretical frameworks in research:

Purpose of a Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework serves as a lens through which the research is viewed and analyzed, helping researchers:

  • Define Key Variables: Identify and operationalize the variables in the study, which are informed by the selected theories.
  • Guide Hypotheses or Research Questions: Ensure that research questions or hypotheses are aligned with established theories and concepts.
  • Shape Methodology: Influence the selection of research design, data collection, and analysis methods based on theoretical principles.
  • Interpret Findings: Provide a context for understanding the significance of findings in relation to existing knowledge.

Components of a Theoretical Framework

A well-developed theoretical framework typically includes:

  • Relevant Theories: Identify and discuss existing theories that are most relevant to the research topic. For example, if studying media influence, theories like the Agenda-Setting Theory or Cultivation Theory may be relevant.
  • Key Concepts and Constructs: Define major concepts and constructs that emerge from these theories. For instance, in a study on social media influence, "peer pressure" or "social comparison" might be key constructs.
  • Relationships Between Variables: Articulate hypothesized relationships among variables based on the theoretical assumptions. For example, a framework might posit that "social comparison on social media (independent variable) is positively related to body image dissatisfaction (dependent variable)."
  • Assumptions: Outline assumptions made in applying these theories to the specific research question. These may include the scope, context, or populations that the theory addresses.

Selecting a Theoretical Framework

The selection of a theoretical framework is guided by:

  • The Research Problem: Choose theories that directly relate to the problem or topic being studied.
  • Existing Literature: Identify theories that have been used in previous studies on similar topics. Reviewing the literature can reveal commonly used frameworks and demonstrate how they have been applied.
  • Scope of Research: Consider the depth and focus of the research, as some frameworks may be better suited for broader or narrower inquiries.
  • Relevance and Applicability: Ensure that the theoretical framework can be reasonably applied to the specific population, setting, or context of the research.

Types of Theories Commonly Used in Theoretical Frameworks

  • Social and Behavioural Theories: Explain human behaviors and social interactions. Examples include Social Cognitive Theory, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Social Exchange Theory.
  • Psychological Theories: Explore individual thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. Theories like Self-Determination Theory or Cognitive Dissonance Theory are often used in studies of motivation and behavior change.
  • Communication Theories: Focus on how information is transmitted and perceived. Agenda-Setting Theory, Uses and Gratifications Theory, and Diffusion of Innovations Theory are common in media and communication research.
  • Organisational and Management Theories: Used in studies of organisational behavior and culture, such as Transformational Leadership Theory and Systems Theory.

Developing a Theoretical Framework

To create a theoretical framework:

  1. Identify the Problem and Research Objectives: Clarify what the study seeks to accomplish and identify the main variables or phenomena under investigation.
  2. Review Relevant Literature: Conduct a comprehensive literature review to find existing theories and frameworks that align with the study’s objectives.
  3. Select Theories and Concepts: Choose relevant theories, models, and concepts that will best explain or predict the relationships between variables.
  4. Define and Explain Relationships: Articulate how these theories suggest specific relationships among variables, using diagrams if helpful.
  5. Justify the Framework: Explain why the chosen theories and concepts are suitable for addressing the research questions or hypotheses.

Example of a Theoretical Framework

Imagine a study investigating the impact of social media on self-esteem among teenagers:

  • Selected Theories: Social Comparison Theory and Self-Determination Theory
  • Key Concepts: Social comparison, intrinsic motivation, and self-worth.
  • Hypothesized Relationships: Based on Social Comparison Theory, the framework posits that teenagers who frequently compare themselves to others on social media may experience lower self-esteem. According to Self-Determination Theory, the framework might suggest that social media reduces intrinsic motivation by fostering external validation.
  • Assumptions: Assumes that social media platforms promote comparisons by showcasing idealized representations of users, potentially impacting self-esteem.

Importance of the Theoretical Framework

  • Grounding Research in Theory: The framework anchors the study within an established body of knowledge, enhancing its credibility.
  • Providing a Basis for Hypothesis Testing: It offers clear, theoretically grounded expectations about relationships among variables.
  • Guiding Interpretation: By providing theoretical explanations, the framework aids in interpreting findings and understanding their broader implications.
  • Facilitating Comparison and Generalisation: The use of widely recognized theories allows comparisons with other studies and generalizations across contexts.

A theoretical framework is indispensable in research as it provides clarity, structure, and rigor to the study. It supports the researcher’s understanding of the topic and ensures that the study’s approach, design, and findings are coherent and meaningful within the field.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Basic Ethics of Researcher

Ethics of a researcher refers to the moral principles and standards that guide researchers in the process of conducting their studies. Ethical guidelines ensure the integrity, transparency, and fairness of research activities, safeguarding the rights and well-being of participants and the credibility of the research process. Here are the key aspects of research ethic s 1. Informed Consent Definition : Researchers must obtain informed consent from all participants, ensuring that they fully understand the purpose of the research, the procedures involved, potential risks, and their rights (such as the right to withdraw at any time). Importance : Ensures that participation is voluntary and that participants are making an informed decision. 2. Confidentiality and Privacy Definition : Researchers must protect the identity and personal information of participants. Data should be anonymized or kept confidential to ensure that individual identities are not revealed without permission. Importanc...

Case Study - Overview

Case Study - Overview A Case Study is an in-depth exploration of a specific subject, event, or organization to gain insights into complex issues, patterns, or phenomena. The introduction of a case study sets the stage for the analysis, providing readers with the necessary background and context. Here are the essential elements of a case study introduction: 1. Background of the Problem Description of the Case : Begin with a brief description of the case being studied. This could be a person, group, organization, or event. Contextual Information : Explain the broader context in which the case exists. This might include industry, historical, social, or economic factors that influence the case. Relevance : Highlight why this case is important to study. It could be because the case is unique, has broader implications, or is representative of a common issue. Example : In studying a company's innovative response to a market crisis, the background might discuss the economic environment, ...

Research Gap

Research Gap A research gap refers to an area of knowledge or an issue in the literature that has not been fully explored or adequately addressed by existing research. Identifying and addressing research gaps is critical because it provides new insights, adds value to existing knowledge, and can contribute to the advancement of a specific field. Types of Research Gap There are several types of research gaps, each defined by the nature of the knowledge deficiency or unanswered questions in the literature. Here are the most common types of research gaps with examples: 1. Evidence Gap An evidence gap occurs when there is limited or no empirical data to support a particular hypothesis, theory, or claim. In such cases, researchers lack concrete data or research studies to validate findings or arguments. Example:   In health research, there might be claims about the benefits of a new dietary supplement for heart disease, but no long-term studies have been conducted to provide empirical e...